“I Prefer Your Presence” — Do You Really, do you love me more than these ?

“I prefer your presence over all these things.”
“I still choose being with you over everything else.”

How wonderful it is to hear words like these. Anyone would want to hear them.

But consider this:
If I have barely spent time with you, yet I say these words—would you believe me?

Emotionally, you might. We, as humans, are deeply influenced by what we see and hear. Words can pull us in, especially in the right atmosphere.

But if you pause… reflect… and allow reason to stand beside emotion—would you still believe me?

Perhaps not. Not because the words were intentionally deceptive, but because they may have been spoken hastily—born out of emotion rather than conviction.

What Does “Preference” Really Mean?

At its core, preference implies experience.

To say “I prefer your presence over all these things” suggests that I have encountered both—your presence and “all these things”—and have made a conscious choice.

Preference is not imagined.
It is experienced.

“Taste and see that the Lord is good; blessed is the one who takes refuge in Him.” (Psalm 34:8, NIV)

You cannot truly prefer what you have not tasted.

The Question That Reveals the Heart

Jesus once asked a piercing question:

“Do you love me more than these?” (John 21:15)

That question still stands.

More than the atmosphere?
More than the moment?
More than the things that surround the experience?

The Test Beyond the Moment

Before you say to him, her, them, or even to God, “I prefer your presence,” ask yourself:

Have you truly experienced that presence?
Or are you caught up in the atmosphere of the moment?

There are moments that feel powerful—music playing, lights on, people gathered, emotions heightened. In such settings, it is easy to make bold declarations.

But what happens when:

  • The music fades?
  • The lights go out?
  • The crowd disperses?

Do you still delight in Him then?

“Be still, and know that I am God.” (Psalm 46:10)

“By day the Lord directs His love, at night His song is with me—a prayer to the God of my life.” (Psalm 42:8)

Is He only your God in the crowd, or also in the quiet?

A Life, Not a Moment

True delight in God is not seasonal or situational—it is continuous:

“But his delight is in the law of the Lord, and on His law he meditates day and night.” (Psalm 1:2)

“Oh, how I love your law! It is my meditation all the day.” (Psalm 119:97)

This is not the language of occasional encounters.
It is the language of a life rooted in Him.

A More Honest Confession

If your delight in His presence depends on the environment—
on the music, the gathering, the atmosphere—
then perhaps the more honest confession would be:

“I prefer your presence in the midst of the crowd.”

And honesty matters.

Because true devotion is not built on emotional peaks, but on consistent pursuit.

Experience the Fullness

If you are going to make a blanket statement—
“I prefer your presence”—

Then you must experience that presence in its fullness:

  • When the music is on… and when it is off
  • When it is loud… and when it is silent
  • When it is easy… and when it is not

“In your presence there is fullness of joy; at your right hand are pleasures forevermore.” (Psalm 16:11)

The Invitation

Now—go ahead. Go on. Go experience Him.

He will not turn His back on you.

“Draw near to God and He will draw near to you.” (James 4:8)

And when you draw near…

“Taste and see that the Lord is good.” (Psalm 34:8, NIV)

Final Reflection

Desiring a moment to last is not wrong.
But understand—it will not always be about that moment.

True preference is revealed in what remains when the moment passes.

So before you say it…
Live it. Experience it. Walk in it.

Only then can you truly say:
“I prefer Your presence.”

Shalom.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

To the Woman: The Final Piece of Creation

 I was inspired by one to write this. Now I share it with others, because it does not describe one woman, but all. To the woman… Not an afterthought of creation, not a final piece carelessly placed— but the last piece brought forth to complete a perfect picture. For without her, the image remains unfinished. She is not weak. She carries within her the power to birth and nurture a nation. From the depths of her pain can rise the heights of great joy. Yet do not mistake gentleness for frailty. Though her strength may take another form, she is capable of causing deep wounds when wronged. She should never be underestimated. She is not less wise. Though her heart may be moved by emotion, wisdom still finds its voice through her lips. She has stood beside kings and rulers, a quiet counselor in the halls of power— the small rudder that steers the great ship, the unseen hand guiding its course. Ignore her words, and you may yet be shipwrecked. When she chooses n...
Read more

No Turning Back – But What Does That Really Mean?

I typed “no turning back” into the YouTube search bar, expecting… well, I didn’t even know what I expected. But what I found was interesting: the first ten videos were all dance challenges, full of rhythm and energy. Scroll a little further down and suddenly the tone shifts — sermons, debates, and critiques asking whether all this dancing and excitement is "right" or "wrong." Let me make this clear: I’m not here to take sides, I’m not claiming insight, “deeper revelation,” or a prophetic voice. What I do know is this — in the middle of the beats and all, the lyrics keep echoing: “I have decided to follow Jesus, no turning back.” And that line demands reflection. Jesus once said to His disciples: “Whoever wants to be my disciple must deny themselves and take up their cross and follow me. For whoever wants to save their life will lose it, but whoever loses their life for me will find it. What good will it be for someone to gain the whole world, yet forfeit their...
Read more

Misunderstanding or Contradiction?: Genesis 1 vs. Genesis 2 — Plants, People, and the Question of Order

Genesis 1 and Genesis 2 often appear to present two different timelines for the creation of plants and humans. At first glance, it can look like a contradiction. But is it? Or is something else going on in the text? Let’s walk through it carefully. The Apparent Problem Genesis 1 (Day 3, Day 6) Plants are created on Day 3. Animals on Day 6. Humans —male and female—also on Day 6. Genesis 2:5 Then we read: “No shrub had yet appeared on the earth and no plant had yet sprung up, for the Lord God had not sent rain on the earth and there was no one to work the ground.” This sounds like plants did not yet exist , and humans did not yet exist , because: There was no rain for plants to grow. There was no man to work the ground. So what gives? Did Genesis 2 forget what Genesis 1 already said? A Possible Explanation: “Created” vs. “Brought Forth” One reasonable way to understand this is to consider that “created” in Genesis 1 may refer to establishing the potential , not necessarily the immed...
Read more